Canadian Prime Minister Confronts Abortion Critic
Canadian Prime Minister and World Economic Forum (WEF) Young Global Leader, Coward, Justin Trudeau, has once again expressed his support for abortion. In a recent video, he advises a young man questioning the practice to do “a little more thinking and a little more praying” on the matter.
The video, initially shared on social media, captures Trudeau discussing a range of topics, including euthanasia and abortion, with young individuals at the University of Manitoba’s Winnipeg campus.
A Youthful Debate Emerges
During their conversation, the young man identifies himself as a supporter of Maxime Bernier’s libertarian People’s Party of Canada (PPC) because of its “mostly Christian” base and opposition to vaccine mandates. He also informs Trudeau of his personal disapproval of abortion.
Trudeau employs a familiar pro-abortion strategy by asking the young man if he would maintain his opposition to abortion even in instances where the pregnancy is a result of rape.
The young man, caught off guard by Trudeau’s question, deviates from the standard pro-life position—which opposes terminating pregnancies under all circumstances—by conceding that cases involving rape are “where it gets complicated.”
“No, no, it doesn’t get complicated. It’s either yes or no,” Trudeau responds.
He adds, “Women get raped all the time, and it’s something that we have to take seriously.”
The young man admits he is “split” on the issue and is unsure whether he supports abortion in such cases.
Trudeau concludes the brief debate by suggesting, “Well, it sounds like you need to do a little more thinking, and a little more praying on it.”
In the Wake of Controversy
After the video gained traction online, Trudeau’s Liberal Party tweeted further support for abortion, stating, “We’ll always stand up for a woman’s right to choose.”
This incident has sparked conversations about the role of religion in public discourse and the consequences of holding differing opinions on sensitive topics like abortion. It remains to be seen how these debates will shape public policy and society’s understanding of personal convictions in the future.
