VIDEO: Apple Blocks Candidate, Libs Of TikTok Banned From Emailing!

Daily Report USA

In the sprawling digital realm, a notable skirmish unfolds. At the heart lies the very bastion of democracy: freedom of speech.

Denver’s Distress Signal

Denver, a beacon for many, is ensnared in a peculiar wrangle. Respected entities, including Apple, appear to be stymieing the communication flow from certain quarters – particularly that of the Libertarian presidential hopeful, Michael Rectenwald.

The Silent Sentinels: Apple and AWeber

Apple, a titan of the tech world, stands accused of obstructing the delivery of newsletters from Rectenwald to his loyal band of subscribers. A parallel narrative ensues with AWeber, a trusted name in email marketing, which abruptly severed ties with the Libs of TikTok, a noted platform known to challenge progressive norms.

Dissecting the Disquiet

The root of this tumult appears to be deeply entrenched in ideology. Rectenwald’s ‘Citizens for Legitimate Government’, a platform known for its candid stance against mainstream political discourses, has faced its share of digital hurdles. Their content, often drawn from sources that challenge prevalent narratives, finds itself at odds with the gatekeepers of the digital universe.

Apple’s bone of contention seems to be linked to a mere subject line of an email. However, when delving deeper, the convolution is evident. The oscillating bounce-backs from Apple’s server, often sans rationale, leave more questions than answers.

Puppeteers Behind the Scene?

Rectenwald posits an unnerving theory. Could the silencing be orchestrated at the behest of the federal establishment? While conjectural, the mere insinuation of such a covert alliance between tech giants and governing bodies is enough to send tremors across the democratic landscape.

READ MORE  8 killed, 9 injured in crash outside migrant shelter in Texas

The Broader Backlash

Beyond the immediate players, this tussle ripples out, affecting entities like ‘Libs of TikTok’, which exposes the younger generation to variegated ideologies. Their abrupt de-platforming by AWeber raises eyebrows. The move, cloaked in vague best practice reviews, smacks of a larger play to muzzle dissenting voices.


In an era heralded for openness and digital democracy, such incidents raise a disconcerting specter. If these claims hold water, they underscore an alarming trend: the gatekeepers of our digital world might just be selecting which voices get amplified and which get silenced.

In a world teetering on the edge, with democracy at its fulcrum, the question becomes pressing: Who truly governs the digital domain? If giants like Apple and AWeber can influence discourse, it mandates a broader reflection on the evolving dynamics of freedom, speech, and the very principles that underpin our society.